Monday, 7 October 2013

The other side to workplace blogging


People are using blogs all around the world to share their views, opinions, ideas and stories over the Internet. Blogging has created a new era of having your voice ‘be heard’ through the ‘blogosphere’. It’s a portal to vent your emotions, share ideas and thoughts and connect with others that interest, share the same ideas and are in the same situation as you. The Workplace has become a common area for people to vent and express their opinions about their current workplace and colleagues. 
Richards and Kosmala’s reading on work and employee blogging, gave me an understanding and the realisation that there are positives and negatives of owning and publishing a blog.



Sharing our ideas through the Internet


Ellis and Richards (2009) “found employees to be attracted to blogging about work because these online forums offers a form of voice other than that provided by trade unions.” People can hide away behind their computers and say what they want to say through an online medium (Ellis & Richards, 2009).

The blogosphere is an online culture where people can read, search information through tags, connect with comments, instantly entering the online world with the quick click of the ‘post’ button. This YouTube video shows how people use blogs, what type of blogs there are and how simple it is to connect to the online world.






However, there is a downside to having your freedom of speech through the Internet. Once information is posted then it is available to anyone and everyone that is wanting to read your blog. Workplace blogging is at risk because it could lead to major implications such as defamation. 
There is a fine line between sharing your thoughts and ideas on the blogosphere as this could offend or defame someone or an organisation, which has terrible implications for the blogger and the organisation. 



Be careful of defamation




Drawing ideas from this weeks reading Richards and Kosmala (2013) which looks at employee cynicism focusing on “the narrative of work blogs…to suggest that being cynical about work can also give an employee a sense of control and attachment to their own occupational or professional community” (Richards & Kosmala, 2013), this cynicism being expressed through the form of blogs. 

This reading looks at how employees have taken up the “blogging phenomenon as a space that has become increasingly associated with employees expressing a wide range of views and opinions related to corporate culture and initiatives” (Richards & Kosmala, 2013).

This type of work blogging however can be seen as frowned upon with studies suggesting that “work blogging should be viewed as an expanding forum for self-organised employee resistance and misbehavior, rejection a reductive view of blogging platforms as forums for 'Cyber-waffle'" (Keen, 2007).

What does this mean for the employee freedom of speech? Schoneboom (2007) “believes work blogging forums have moved on from being sites for explicit cynical attacks on employers to more settled and organised vocal movements”. 

The use of social media is for people to be able to communicate on an online platform with accessibility through many different portable devices. Blogging is a form of an online diary, this being no different to a diary in book form but only now it is available to be viewed on the Internet, with everyone’s eyes all around the world having the ability to view this ‘online diary’ 24/7. 

Blogging 

When these online blogs are published on the Internet and contain deceitful information this is when the damage can be done.  Defamation is a growing concern within the online environment through not only social media but the concern lays with anything that is published on the web.  

Not only can this affect the reputation of an individual or a company but it can attract unwanted media attention that could potentially be even more threatening to the reputation of the company or the individual/s involved.



For a company this media attention could be the best thing with a reference of their business through a blog that comments on its positive services and products or it could be damaging through online discussion about their negative practices. 
Not only do blogs give freedom of speech but they also have the potential to attract media attention which “given to work blogs has led to intense online discussions about the defence of employee rights” (Schoneboom, 2011). 

But, What can be done about employee's blogging defamatory comments about an individual or organisation?.

Guidelines can help assist a company on the rules to their employees about the dangers of social media. This YouTube video discusses the idea of how companies should consider establishing clear guidelines when it comes to their internal employees using blogging and social media. Social media can be a great source of promotion and advertising for a company if it is use effectively and ethically. 


Blogging and social media are so widely used these days that it is impossible to avoid being pulled into the social media frenzy.
Micro-blogging websites such as Twitter have allowed people to be able to communicate in a smaller blogging environment. Twitter runs on the theory that people post ‘tweets’ which are micro blogs that make up to 140 characters and can be posted whenever the persons desires. 

Nielson states that “Twitter users send 400million tweets each day”. With twitter being available on every online platform as an application on iPads, iPhones, laptops and other mobile devices means that employees can use micro-blogging sites to be able to ‘update’ what they are doing and discuss anything they would like over this social media site. 


Much like normal blogs, twitter also works on the theory of hash tagging which means that anyone can be associated with a word that they hash tag. This can be a growing concern for a business if employees use this micro-blogging medium as a form of venting about an organisation or an individual as hash tagging can link to the organisation or the person being involved. 
It has proven in recent media events that the issue with social media can draw unwanted attention to the individual or an organisation involved. Celebrities are always being brought into the spotlight through social media, this could be for a positive reason and mainly always for a negative.

Miley Cyrus Twitter tweet


American Actress and Singer Miley Cyrus, is an example how the pop princess has relied on social media to create an image within society that she is not a ‘little girl anymore’ and that her stage name ‘Hannah Montanna’ is in the past.  Cyrus used Twitter to track her transformation of her new image through micro-blogging by taking photos of her hair being shaved off, then dyed and a new clothing style, All uploaded to Twitter for her followers to be able to follow. 

But has the pressure from the music industry and social media for celebrities and people constantly in the spotlight affecting their social well-being to transform into something they do not need to be?.

With all the sager of Miley being caught up in social media showdowns with other famous celebrities, what does this mean for Disney? Who was the sole company that started Miley Cyrus within the Hannah Montanna franchise.

As online prosumers we are responsible for what we create and upload on the Internet so once something has been posted there is generally no way we can turn back. We created this content for the world to consume and its our responsibility that we make sure that is appropriate for people to see.  Social media is so globalised these days that we heavily rely on it as a source of information, forgetting that everyone is able to view the content we upload.

People use social media such as Twitter and traditional blogging sites as a way to avoid the real world and confronting daily challenges that arise. For some being behind a computer screen is a much more safe place to discuss issues over a blog than confrontation.




References:


Ellis, V. and J. Richards (2009), ‘Creativity, Connecting and Correcting: Motivations and Meanings

of Work-Blogging among Public Service Workers’, in S. Bolton and M. Houlihan (eds), Work Matters: Reflections on Contemporary Work (London: Palgrave), pp. 250–268.


Schoneboom, A. (2007), ‘Diary of a Working Boy: Creative Resistance among Anonymous Workbloggers’,
Ethnography 8, 4, 403–423.

Schoneboom, A. (2011a), ‘Sleeping Giants? Fired Workbloggers and Labour Organisation’, New
Technology, Work and Employment 26, 1, 17–28.

Richards, J. & Kosmala, K., 2013 'In the end, you can only slag people off for so long: employee cynicism through work blogging', New Technology, Work and Employment. vol.28, no.1, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp.68-77.

Keen, A. 2007, 'The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy'.








https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFfTUFUGpV97KlcIKFqzW_4nPYq7WsmNLJOorBKNu_2YBIQigvsMEr4qss91H1i-1CYvRpWGMNGzv-WUQ3NfjEGsCLfOLue7T5efIMelJ46XLia6j42bCuwON_U7wJCvukJ46a4O6CMpGQ/s320/Employee+Blogging+Guidelines.jpg (Google Images)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwcW5AKcfl4 - ‘What is blogging?’, 2012.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=747PGdPu3ZU, ' Employee Blogging Policy and Employee Social Networking Pol, YouTube, 2010.